Rewritten on 2026-09-30 under the current data integrity rules: usable trips changed to 537, the within-trip test has not been rerun on the current data and there is no blank-trip record, so whether dawn and dusk fish better is inconclusive; the earlier conclusion is withdrawn. Other studies remain under review.
Is the Bite Better at Dawn and Dusk? Within-Trip Rates Are Inconclusive on Current Data
The earlier finding from 1,185 trips that twilight bite rates are no higher than midday is withdrawn. In the 2026-09-26 snapshot only 537 trips have integrity-verified sun position and meet the trip rule (one angler, one day, at least 3 catches, first to last at least one hour apart); the within-trip exposure bins and permutation test have not been rebuilt, and trips with no catch or only one or two catches never enter the denominator. Whether dawn and dusk fish better is currently inconclusive.
Inconclusive: only 537 usable trips, 184 of them with photo capture times, and the within-trip test has not been rerun on this cohort.
Reviewed 2026-09-30 | Data 2025-01-01 to 2026-09-25
Verdict: inconclusive
The earlier version treated the time between an angler's first and last catch of a day as time spent fishing, binned 1,185 trips (5,658 hours) from 2025-01-01 to 2026-09-04 by sun altitude, and concluded that twilight bite rates are no higher than midday. That conclusion is withdrawn.
There are three reasons. Under the current integrity rules the usable trips changed from 1,185 to 537, and photo-timed trips from 422 to 184; the sun-altitude exposure bins and permutation test have not been rebuilt on them. Only trips with at least 3 catches spanning an hour or more enter the denominator, so trips with no catch or one or two catches are invisible. The data do not record whether the angler kept fishing between the first and last catch.
So whether dawn and dusk fish better is currently inconclusive. This is neither a finding of no difference nor a finding that twilight is better.
What was measured
Of 14,424 eligible catches from 2025-01-01 to 2026-09-25, 14,328 have an integrity-verified sun position.
537 trips meet the rule (302 anglers, 214 days) with 2,442 catches; excluding each trip's first and last catch leaves 1,368 within-trip catches over 1,872 hours between first and last.
Using photo capture times only: 184 trips (119 anglers, 64 days), 492 within-trip catches over 612.9 hours.
What would be needed
The start and end time of every trip, and trips with no catch, so the denominator is not limited to productive trips.
Sun-altitude exposure bins rebuilt on a fixed snapshot, hypotheses written down before looking at the data, then a rerun of the permutation test and power analysis.
Data and method
Source: a read-only point-in-time snapshot taken 2026-09-26 (38,040 catch records), recomputed offline with no production reads or writes.
Records count when the current record, species identity and context rules all pass and both upload and verified capture time are on or before 2026-09-25; shrimp-fishing, managed-pond and non-fish records are excluded. Sun position counts only when the app's environment integrity check verifies it.
A trip is one angler on one Taipei date with at least 3 catches whose first and last are at least one hour apart.
Keep a record of your own trips
What this study lacks is a record of every trip from start to finish, including trips with no catch. Use the App to log your catches, places and times for your own future comparisons.
Citation and data
公開頁面可免費閱讀與逐頁引用,請標示 DudeFishinG 並連回原頁,建議註明擷取日期;不提供底層漁獲紀錄下載,也不授權整批複製或再散布資料集。詳見資料使用條款。